NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nader v Aboulahaf [2014] NSWDC 14 Decision date: 07 February 2014 Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Dismiss the four notices of motion. (2) Dismiss any cross claims filed by the defendants in the proceedings against the Nominal Defendant. (3) Order the defendant applicant to pay the respondent Nominal Defendant's costs of the notice of motion. Catchwords: INSURANCE - motor vehicles - compulsory third party insurance - unidentified vehicle - all prerequisites for driver to join Nominal Defendant not met - "full" but not "satisfactory" explanation given in time - "full details of allegations made" as then known provided to Nominal Defendant in time - due inquiry and search not made. Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 36. Cases Cited: Blandford v Fox (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 241. Cavanagh v Nominal Defendant [1958] HCA 57; 100 CLR 375. Nominal Defendant v Meakes [2012] NSWCA 66. Nominal Defendant v Staggs [2010] NSWCA 224; 79 NSWLR 309. Oztan v NSW Ministerial Corporation (1995) 23 MVR 259. Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Ali Nader, Khadije Nader, Mohamad Nader, Moustafa Younes (Plaintiffs) Youssef Aboulahaf (Defendant/Applicant) Nominal Defendant (Respondent to Application) Representation: Counsel: M A Kumar (Defendant/Applicant) J B Turnbull (Respondent to Application) Dr W A J Higgs (Plaintiffs) File Number(s): DC 2013/00110433; DC 2013/00110406; DC 2013/00110496; DC 2013/00317362
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate