NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McKellar v R [2014] NSWCCA 35 Hearing dates: 14 March 2014 Decision date: 14 March 2014 Before: Basten JA; Button J; RS Hulme AJ Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL - criminal - interlocutory appeal - joint trial - prejudice to applicant from inadmissible evidence tendered against co-accused - refusal by trial judge to order separate trial - trial judge held appropriate directions on evidence would suffice - whether there was a material error of fact in refusing a separate trial - errors alleged regarding the intended use of evidence by the Crown - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Cases Cited: DAO v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 63; 81 NSWLR 568 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 R v Basha (1989) 39 A Crim R 337 R v Pham [2004] NSWCCA 190 R v Webb and Hay (1992) 59 SASR 563 Symss v The Queen [2003] NSWCCA 77 Webb v The Queen; Hay v The Queen [1994] HCA 30; 181 CLR 41 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Ethan Wayne McKellar (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
Mr I H Wallach (Applicant) Mr P Ingram SC (Respondent) Solicitors:
Birchgrove Legal (Applicant) Solicitors for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): CCA 2011/144687 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Date of Decision: 2014-03-10 00:00:00 Before: R A Hulme J File Number(s): SC 2011/144687
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate