NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tempe Recreation Reserve Trust v Sydney Water Corporation (No 2) [2014] NSWLEC 23 Hearing dates: 13 March 2014 Decision date: 20 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Biscoe J Decision: Respondent's amended notice of motion filed on 11 February 2014 dismissed with costs. Catchwords: COSTS - offer of compromise - proceeding for compensation for compulsory acquisition by Sydney Water of an easement across most of a public reserve, utilised for a large water pipeline - Court determines compensation of $106,000 based on interpretation of the easement that the pipeline could not be placed above the surface - ten months prior to hearing respondent acquiring authority makes offer of compromise under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 for judgment for applicant for $268,000 - offer not accepted - respondent moves for order that it pay applicant's costs to date of offer and that applicant pay respondent's costs on an indemnity basis thereafter under r 42.15 UCPR - whether r 42.15(2) engaged - if so, whether an "otherwise order" should be made - discretionary considerations in the case of an offer of compromise in compulsory acquisition compensation proceedings. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 ss 3(1), 90, 98, 106(1)(a), Part 8 Crown Lands Act 1989 s 106A Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 ss 55, 66, 68, Part 3 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 19(e) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 14.15(2), 20.26, Part 42 Division 3, r 1.5 Schedule 1 Cases Cited: Al Amanah College Inc v Minister for Education and Training (No 4) [2012] NSWLEC 26 Barakat v Bazdarova [2012] NSWCA 140 Brock v Roads and Maritime Services [2012] NSWCA 404, (2012) 191 LGERA 267 Caine v Lumley General Insurance Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 109 Dillon v Gosford City Council [2011] NSWCA 328, (2011) 184 LGERA 179 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service v King [2006] NSWCA 2 Tempe Recreation Reserve Trust v Sydney Water Corporation [2013] NSWLEC 221 Viera v O'Shea (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 121 Category: Costs Parties: Tempe Recreation (D.500215 & D.1000502) Reserve Trust (Applicant) Sydney Water Corporation (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: A Galasso SC (Applicant) R P Lancaster SC and N Zerial (Respondent) SOLICITORS: Marrickville Council (Applicant) King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent) File Number(s): 30915/12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate