NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Joy Lorraine Knight pursuant to s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 285 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 19 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: Application refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - whether doubt or question as to a mitigating circumstance - whether sentence infected by Muldrock error - supplying a large commercial quantity of prohibited drug (ecstasy) - guilty plea - doubt or question not demonstrated - application refused Legislation Cited: Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Butler v R [2012] NSWCCA 172 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Knight; R v Biuvanua [2007] NSWCCA 283; 176 A Crim R 338 R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 195 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Sinkovich v Attorney General of NSW [2013] NSWCA 383 Cases Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joy Lorraine Knight (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: --- Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/215529 Publication restriction: ---
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate