NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Atkins [2014] NSWSC 292 Hearing dates: 14 March 2014 Decision date: 21 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Johnson J Decision: An extended supervision order is made for a period of five years subject to 58 conditions set out in the Schedule to this judgment Catchwords: SERIOUS SEX OFFENDER - application for continuing detention order or extended supervision order - sex offences in 1991 and 2007 - offender with intellectual disability - assessment required concerning suitability for anti-libidinal medication - five-year order appropriate - extended supervision order made Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: Attorney General for NSW v Gallagher [2006] NSWSC 340 Attorney General for NSW v Hadson [2008] NSWSC 140 Attorney General for NSW v Quinn [2007] NSWSC 873 Cornwall v Attorney General for NSW [2007] NSWCA 374 DCU v State Parole Authority of NSW [2006] NSWSC 526 Kruck v Southern Queensland Regional Parole Board [2009] QSC 39
Lee v State Parole Authority of NSW [2006] NSWSC 1225 State of New South Wales v Ali [2010] NSWSC 1045 State of New South Wales v Atkins [2013] NSWSC 1988 State of New South Wales v Cruse (No. 2) [2014] NSWSC 128 State of New South Wales v Fisk [2013] NSWSC 364 State of New South Wales v Richardson (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 276; 210 A Crim R 220 State of New South Wales v Tillman [2008] NSWSC 1293 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Bruce Allan Atkins (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr NM Kelly (Plaintiff) Mr PA Johnson (Defendant) Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) Legal Aid NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/359164 Publication restriction: ---
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate