NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mortada v R [2014] NSWCCA 36 Hearing dates: 4 and 16 December 2013 Decision date: 24 March 2014 Before: Leeming JA; Hall J; Schmidt J Decision: (1) Extension of time to appeal granted. (2) Leave under Rule 4 granted. (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - failure to give propensity direction contrary to ruling when evidence admitted - whether deliberate forensic decision not to seek direction - whether guilty verdict inevitable and no substantial miscarriage of justice - proviso applied to dismiss appeal Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193B Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25, 29, Sch 1 Cases Cited: Baini v The Queen [2012] HCA 59; 246 CLR 469 Belhaven and Stenton Peerage (1875) 1 AC 278 BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 Burrell v R [2009] NSWCCA 193 Cesan v The Queen [2008] HCA 52; 236 CLR 358 Dearman v Dearman (1908) 7 CLR 549 Dib & Dib v R (1991) 52 A Crim R 64 DJV v R (2008) 200 A Crim R 206 Gillies v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2008] NSWCCA 339 Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131 Giourtalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 216 JDK v R (2009) 194 A Crim R 333 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; 243 CLR 361 Lee v R [2013] NSWCCA 68 Lundy v The Queen (New Zealand) [2013] UKPC 28 Quartermaine v The Queen (1980) 143 CLR 595 R v Giovannone [2002] NSWCCA 323; 140 A Crim 1 Reg v Kilbourne [1973] AC 729 Shepherd v The Queen (1991) 170 CLR 573 Stafford v The State [1999] 1 WLR 2026 Versi v R [2013] NSWCCA 206 Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81; 224 CLR 300 Wilde v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 365 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ali Youssef Mortada (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Strickland SC (Appellant) P Ingram SC (Crown) Solicitors: Bannisters Lawyers (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/270970 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-09-28 00:00:00 Before: Knox DCJ File Number(s): 2009/270970
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate