NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Campton v Centennial Newstan Pty Ltd (No 1) [2014] NSWSC 304 Hearing dates: 24-27 February 2014; 17-21 March 2014 Decision date: 21 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hall J Decision: (1)The defendant's application to exclude from evidence the joint reports of the four conclaves referred to in [16] from evidence, is refused. (2)I will hear the parties on the question of costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Expert evidence - Joint reports of experts - Admissibility of joint reports - Whether reasons are required for agreement between experts - Whether conclave failed to identify the material it relied upon - Whether consideration of extraneous material by the conclave constituted an irrelevant consideration - Whether experts are required to be provided with a joint statement of assumptions - Whether the questions asked of the conclave were drafted in terms that addressed relevant issues and matters appropriate for consideration by experts - Whether the joint reports are inconsistent with the common law "statement of reasoning" rule - Whether the joint reports are inconsistent with the Makita principle - Application of s 79 of the Evidence Act to joint reports of experts - Whether Court should exercise discretion to exclude the joint reports under s 135 of the Evidence Act Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Evidence Act 1995 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Ainsworth v Burden [2005] NSWCA 174 Barescape Pty Ltd v Bacchus Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1002 Collins v Sydney Ports Corporation [2012] NSWSC 115 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21, (2011) 243 CLR 588 Gillett v Robinson [2011] NSWSC 1143 Goddard v Central Coast Health Network [2013] NSWSC 1932 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Re GHI (a Protected Person) [2005] NSWCA 466 Turjman v Stonewall Hotel Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 392 X v Sydney Children's Hospitals Specialty Network (No 4) [2011] NSWSC 1310 X v Sydney Children's Hospitals Specialty Network (No 5) [2011] NSWSC 1351 X v Sydney Children's Hospitals Specialty Network (No 6) [2011] NSWSC 1353 Texts Cited: Australian Law Reform Commission Report 102, "Uniform Evidence Law" (2006) Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Aaronson, Dyer & Groves (LawBook, 3rd ed, 1973) Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Ian Barry Campton (Plaintiff) Centennial Newstan Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Dooley SC; P O'Rourke (Plaintiff) M Joseph SC; D Stanton (Defendant) Solicitors: Whitelaw McDonald (Plaintiff) Sparke Helmore (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/70316
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate