NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Goodridge v R [2014] NSWCCA 37 Hearing dates: 3.12.2013 Decision date: 26 March 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Simpson J at [152] Johnson J at [153] Decision: (1) In relation to the conviction appeal, appeal dismissed. (2) In relation to the application for leave to appeal against sentence, leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - appellant unfit to be tried - special hearing before judge alone - offence of murder - whether appellant suffering from substantial impairment by abnormality of mind arising from an underlying condition - reports from two psychiatrists - diagnosis of acquired brain injury and alcohol intoxication at time of offence - psychiatrists not shown ERISPs and statements from lay witnesses - 5 hours of ERISPs taken within 2 days of offence - whether analysis of psychiatric evidence by trial judge accurate - whether opinion of psychiatrists displaced by ERISPs and evidence of lay witnesses - opinion of psychiatrists seriously undermined by ERISPs not being made available to them - trial judge's verdict not unreasonable and supported by the evidence - appropriate directions given by trial judge - no denial of procedural fairness - trial judge gave adequate opportunity to parties to address as to issues - SENTENCE APPEAL - whether limiting term manifestly excessive - trial judge appropriately applied sentencing principles while having regard to mental state of appellant - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s18(1)(a) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s5(1)(b), s6(1) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) - s33(3) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 - s21(3)(c) Cases Cited: Bhuiyan v R [2009] NSWCCA 221 Devaney v R [2012] NSWCCA 285 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Fleming v R [1998] HCA 68; 197 CLR 250 Kurdi v R [2011] NSWCCA 179 M v R [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 MFA v R [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 Madden v R [2011] NSWCCA 254 Matter of Adams - MHRT 25 July 2013 Morris v R [1987] HCA 50, 163 CLR 454 R v AN [2005] NSWCCA 239 R v Hall (1988) 36 A Crim R 368 R v Hucker [2002] NSWSC 1068 R v Klamo [2008] VSCA 75; 18 VR 644 R v Mailes [2004] NSWCCA 394; 62 NSWLR 181 R v Maxwell [1998] 217 ALR 452 R v Potts [2012] NSWCCA 229 R v Welsh (1996) 90 A Crim R 364 at 373-374 Rasic v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 The Queen v Keenan [2009] HCA 1; 236 CLR 397 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael William Goodridge - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr J Stratton SC/Ms N Mikhaiel - Applicant Ms T Smith - Respondent Crown Solicitors: SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2009/38556 Decision under appeal Citation: R v Goodridge [2012] NSWSC 378 R v Goodridge (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1180 Date of Decision: 2012-10-03 00:00:00 Before: Adamson J File Number(s): 2009/38556
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate