Condensing Vaporisers Aust Pty Ltd t/as R J Tinker & Son v FDC Construction & Fitout Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 95

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Condensing Vaporisers Aust Pty Ltd t/as R J Tinker & Son v FDC Construction & Fitout Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 95 Hearing dates: 26 March 2014 Decision date: 01 April 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA Ward JA Decision: The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: APPEAL - civil - application for leave to appeal - significantly less than $100,000 at issue - applicant's case no more than arguable - no issue of principle or question of general public importance - leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.41 Cases Cited: Be Financial Pty Limited v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Limited [1995] NSWCA 69 Stanton v Fell [2014] NSWCA 44 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Condensing Vaporisers Aust Pty Ltd t/as R J Tinker and Son (Applicant) FDC Construction & Fitout Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Pesman SC/C Alexander (Applicant) F Corsaro SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Bay Legal (Applicant) Clark McNamara Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): CA 2014/33358 Decision under appeal Citation: FDC Constructions & Fitout Pty Limited v Condensing Vaporisers Aust. Pty Ltd t/as RJ Tinker and Son [2013] NSWSC 1073 Date of Decision: 2013-08-09 00:00:00 Before: Slattery J File Number(s): 2011/384083