NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tuuta [2014] NSWCCA 40 Hearing dates: 17 March 2014 Decision date: 03 April 2014 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Hoeben CJ at CL at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: (i)the Crown appeal is allowed; (ii)the sentence imposed by his Honour Judge Craigie SC on 7 August 2013 is quashed; (iii)in lieu thereof, the respondent is sentenced to a non-parole period of 5 years imprisonment commencing on 3 September 2012 and expiring on 2 September 2017, with an additional term of one year and 8 months imprisonment commencing on 3 September 2017 and expiring on 2 May 2019; (iv)the total sentence is one of 6 years and 8 months imprisonment; (v)the respondent will be eligible for release on parole on 2 September 2017; (vi)the total term of imprisonment will expire on 2 May 2019. Catchwords: APPEAL - Crown appeal against manifest inadequacy of sentence - respondent found guilty by a jury of causing grievous bodily harm with intent - unprovoked assault constituted by repeated blows upon the victim causing bilateral fracture of the jaw - offending found by sentencing judge to amount to a gratuitous and vicious assault - where respondent had a history of violent offending and was on parole for similar offending at the time - youth of the respondent the sole mitigating factor found by sentencing judge -non-parole period of 3 years, 7 months and 6 days imprisonment, with a balance of term of 2 years, 4 months and 25 days imposed at first instance - sentence manifestly inadequate - particular need for a strong measure of general deterrence - respondent re-sentenced to a non-parole period of 5 years imprisonment with an additional term of 1 year and 18 months - finding of special circumstances not warranted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 NSW Cases Cited: AM v R [2012] NSWCCA 203 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54 Duncombe v R [2003] NSWCCA 27 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Han v R [2009] NSWCCA 300 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Matzick v R [2007] NSWCCA 92 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242 R v Carter [2003] NSWCCA 243 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Hili; R v Jones [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 195 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Woods CCA (NSW) 9 October 1990 unreported R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v Zhang [2004] NSWCCA 358 Ramea v R [2013] NSWCCA 310 RLS v R [2012] NSWCCA 236 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina - Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate