NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bryant v Bryant [2014] NSWSC 374 Hearing dates: 18, 19 and 20 September 2013 Decision date: 01 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Lindsay J Decision: 1. Declare that the defendant holds his interest in the family home on trust for the second plaintiff. 2. Orders for the transfer of that interest to the second plaintiff. Catchwords: ESTOPPEL - Equitable estoppel - Proprietary estoppel - Creation or encouragement of assumption - Representation by husband, and father, that he would transfer interest in family home to son - Estoppel operative in favour of wife and son Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 NSW, s 66G. Family Law Act 1975 Cth, s 79, s 79(4), s 75(2) Family Court s 79 s 44(3)(c), s 44(4)(a) Limitation Act 1969 NSW Cases Cited: Ciaglia v Ciaglia [2010] NSWSC 341 at [36]. Delaforce v Simpson-Cook (2010) 78 NSWLR 483, 486 [5] Forgeard v Shanahan (1994) 35 NSWLR 206 at 221-224 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101 Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd (1874) LR 5 PC 221 at 239-240 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 and Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Orr v Ford (1989) 167 CLR 316 at 337 esp 340-341 Tadrous v Tadrous [2012] NSWCA 16 at [38] Waddell v Waddell [2012] NSWCA 214 at [65]-[66] Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Young v Lalic [2006] NSWSC 18 at [32]-[49] Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: Judee Bryant (First Plaintiff) Maddison Eric William Bryant (Second Plaintiff) Maxwell John Bryant (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Jane Merkel (Plaintiffs) RE Dubler SC (Defendant) Solicitors: Fleming & Associates (Plaintiffs) O'Reilly & Sochacki Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/0239418
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate