NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Re Estate Pierobon, Deceased [2014] NSWSC 387 Hearing dates: 31 March 2014 Decision date: 03 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Probate List Before: Lindsay J Decision: 1. Orders for dismissal of a motion for subpoenas to be set aside and claim of client-legal privilege. 2. Order for access to documents produced on subpoena. Catchwords: SUCCESSION - Wills probate and administration - Testamentary instruments - "suspicious circumstances rule" - Evidence - Application to set aside subpoenas - Legitimate forensic purpose - application dismissed
EVIDENCE - Facts excluded from proof - On grounds of privilege - Legal profession - Probate - Statements of witnesses to execution of will not privileged. "Rule in Re Fuld" - Claim to privilege dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 NSW, s 14 Evidence Act 1995 NSW; s 119; Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW, r 1.9; Succession Act 2006, s 8 Cases Cited: Botany Bay Instrumentation & Control Pty Limited v Stewart [1984] 3 NSWLR 98 Clocchiatti v Chadwick [2012] NSWSC 1308 at [9]-[14] Esso Australia Resources Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 at 64-65 [35]) In Re Brock; Jones v Jones (1908) 24 TLR 839 at 840 In re Levy, deceased (No 2) [1957] VR 662 at 665 In re Webster [1974] 1 WLR 1641. In the Estate of Fuld, Deceased; Hartley v Fuld (Attorney-General intervening) [1965] P 405 at 409F-411B National Employers' Mutual General Association Limited v Waind and Hill [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 at 381-382 Oakes v Uzzell [1932]P 19 Re McMahon [1955] VLR 173 at 174 The Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 at 573-575 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757 at 770 [43]-774 [55] Tyrrell v Painton [1894] P151 at 157 (and 159) Texts Cited: GL Certoma, The Law of Succession in NSW (Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 4th ed, 2010) para [6.60], p. 95 Mason and Handler, Succession Law and Practice NSW (Lexis Nexis Butterworths), para [6085] RS Geddes, CJ Rowland and P Studdert, Wills, Probate and Administraiton Law in NSW (LBC, Sydney, 1996), para [40.65], p 295 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Nicolina Clocchiatti (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) Scalabrini Village Limited ACN 000 770 598 (Third Defendant/Cross Claimant) Representation: Counsel: D Allen (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) B Burke (Third Defendant/Cross Claimant) Solicitors: Mitry Lawyers (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) Hicksons (Third Defendant/Cross Claimant) File Number(s): 2012/00051116
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate