NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by MLP pursuant to s. 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 390 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 04 April 2014 Before: Bellew J Decision: (i) The application is granted; (ii) The matter is referred to the Court of Criminal Appeal to be dealt with as an appeal under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application under s. 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - whether doubt or question as to a mitigating circumstance - whether sentence infected by Muldrock error - where applicant convicted after trial of one count of sexual intercourse with a child - error established - application granted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: MLP v R [2006] NSWCCA 271 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 The Application of Joy Lorraine Knight pursuant to s. 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act [2014] NSWSC 285 The Application of Victor Makarov pursuant to s. 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 NSW [2013] NSWSC 1468 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MLP - Applicant Attorney-General for NSW - Respondent Representation: Counsel: - Solicitors: Legal Aid New South Wales - Applicant Crown Solicitor for New South Wales - Respondent File Number(s): 2013/215629-1 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate