NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dang v R [2014] NSWCCA 47 Hearing dates: 2 April 2014 Decision date: 09 April 2014 Before: Simpson J at [1] Davies J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - appeal - alleging error based on exchanges in course of the hearing - relevance of secondary count being included in principal count - framing of charges under prosecutorial discretion - whether leave to appeal ought be sought on grounds contrary to concessions made before primary judge -whether procedural unfairness occurred when primary judge fixed non-parole period in excess of a prior indication - no denial of procedural fairness- whether sentence was manifestly excessive - caution to be exercised when drawing direct comparisons with other sentences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 527C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 9, s 21A Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25, s 25A Cases Cited: Button v R [2010] NSWCCA 264 Carroll v The Queen [2009] HCA 13 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2005] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Koklas v R [2003] NSWCCA 302 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; 214 CLR 1 Tran v R [2007] NSWCCA 140 Weir v R [2011] NSWCCA 123 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Phong Dang (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Barrow (Applicant) N Noman SC (Respondent) Solicitors: SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/922590 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-12-03 00:00:00 Before: Syme J File Number(s): 2012/92259
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate