NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Pratten (No 9) [2012] NSWSC 1672 Hearing dates: 12 March 2012, 14 March 2012, 19 March 2012-23 March 2012, 26 March 2012 -29 March 2012, 02 April 2012, 04 April 2012 -05 April 2012, 11 April 2012, 14 April 2012 -30 April 2012, 01 May 2012 -02 May 2012, 04 May 2012, 07 May 2012, 09 May 2012-28 May 2012 Decision date: 28 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: 1. Application for a directed verdict is rejected. Catchwords: CRIMINAL - Interlocutory proceedings - accused charged with obtaining financial advantage by deception contrary to s 134.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) -directed verdict application - tax payable on objectively ascertained income - dishonest return claimed not to be capable of giving rise to offence - application refused Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v JMR (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 Doney v The Queen [1990] HCA 51; (1990) 171 CLR 207 Matthews v Fountain [1982] VR 1045 R v Haas (1986) 22 A Crim R 299 R v Philip Wan Por Leung (No 3) [2009] NSWSC 450 R v R (1989) 18 NSWLR 74 Re Mendonca; Ex parte Commissioner of Taxation (1969) 15 FLR 256 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Timothy Charles Pratten (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr K Chapple SC with Mr B Hatfield (Crown) Mr M Leighton-Daly (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/315475
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate