NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Whitehouse Properties Pty Limited v BP Australia Pty Limited [2014] NSWSC 410 Hearing dates: 3 April 2014 Decision date: 11 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: Ball J Decision: (1) The question identified for separate determination by Hammerschlag J on 21 March 2014 be answered "No". (2) The summons be dismissed. (3) The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CONTRACT - construction - lease - whether defendant obliged to remove "hardstand" - whether hardstand a "trade fixture Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: D'Arcy v Burelli Investments Pty Ltd (1987) 8 NSWLR 317 Electricity Generation Corporation t/as Verve Energy v Woodside Energy Ltd [2014] HCA 7 Geita Sebea v Territory of Papua [1941] HCA 37; (1941) 67 CLR 544 New Zealand Government Property Corporation v HM & S Ltd (the New York Star) [1982] 1 QB 1145 Category: Separate question Parties: Whitehouse Properties Pty Limited (Plaintiff) BP Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: CRC Newlinds SC with D Klineberg (Plaintiff) J Stoljar SC with JAC Potts (Defendant) Solicitors: Henry Davis York (Plaintiff) Clayton Utz (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/384998 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate