NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Khoury v Holroyd City Council [2014] NSWLEC 37 Hearing dates: 17 March 2014 Decision date: 17 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Preston CJ Decision: Orders as set out at [29] Catchwords: COSTS - appeal against order - requiring cessation of use - applicant applied to withdraw appeal on first day of hearing - leave to withdraw refused - appeal heard in absence of applicant - whether applicant should pay respondent's costs of appeal on indemnity basis - whether failed or delayed providing documents - whether acted unreasonably - whether appeal lacked reasonable prospects of success - applicant acted unreasonably in delaying notification of wish to withdraw - did not fail to file essential documents - unable to determine prospects of success - conduct not sufficiently delinquent for indemnity costs - applicant to pay respondent's costs of preparation and attendance at appeal after conclusion of conciliation conference - applicant to pay respondent's costs of notice of motion for costs Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 121B, 121ZK(1) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 34 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 3.7(2) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Robert Khoury (Applicant) Holroyd City Council (Respondent) Representation: Applicant in person Ms K Law (Solicitor) (Respondent) Applicant in person MatthewsFolbigg Lawyers File Number(s): 10472 of 2013 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate