NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lam v R [2014] NSWCCA 50 Hearing dates: 4 April 2014 Decision date: 01 May 2014 Before: RA Hulme J at [1] Davies J at [2] Adamson J at [49] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - supply prohibited drug - whether good character should be accorded less weight for drug offences - parity - same judge sentences both offenders - submission at sentencing hearing by applicant that parity principle not engaged - appeal ground based on lack of parity Cases Cited: Athos v R [2013] NSWCCA 205 Brent Redfern v R [2012] NSWCCA 178 Loader v R; Dunn v R [2013] NSWCCA 215 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Leroy (1984) 13 A Crim R 469 R v Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 Restuccia v R [2012] NSWCCA 15 Sinkovich v R [2011] NSWCCA 90 Van Can Ha [2008] NSWCCA 141 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tuyet Lam (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Smith (Applicant) H Wilson SC (Crown) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/224579 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-07-22 00:00:00 Before: Bozic DCJ File Number(s): 2011/224579
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate