NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2014] NSWSC 424 Hearing dates: 01/04/2014 Decision date: 02 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: Dismiss the notice of motion of 24 February 2014 insofar as the relief set out in Orders 1, 2 and 3 contained therein is concerned. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - interlocutory - disqualification of trial Judge; application for - disqualification of all Justices of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from hearing proceedings; application for - apprehended bias - necessity for an independent and impartial tribunal - whether the Supreme Court of New South Wales is an interested party - whether principle of necessity is applicable Legislation Cited: Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Vic) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1990] HCA 31; (1990) 170 CLR 70 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association [1983] HCA 17; (1983) 151 CLR 288 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL [1986] HCA 34; (1986) 161 CLR 342 McLean v Nicholson [2002] VSC 446 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; (2011) 244 CLR 427 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Martin Otto Waterhouse (P) Independent Commission Against Corruption (D) Representation: Counsel: In person (P) N J Beaumont SC / N F Case (D) Solicitors: In person (P) NSW Crown Solicitor's Office (D) File Number(s): 2013/00086239
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate