NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v O'Connor [2014] NSWCCA 53 Hearing dates: 4 April 2014 Decision date: 15 April 2014 Before: RA Hulme J at [1] Davies J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed 2. Quash the sentence imposed by Haesler DCJ on 29 November 2013 and in lieu thereof: (a) impose a sentence of fourteen years to commence on 31 January 2012 with a non-parole period of ten years and six months; (b) note that the earliest time the respondent is eligible to be released is 31 July 2022. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - Crown appeal - manifest inadequacy - where sentencing judge placed unwarranted emphasis on rehabilitation and treatment of offender after offender was assaulted - relevance and proof of extra-curial punishment - ensuring maintenance of community expectations and public confidence in the administration of justice Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44, s 53, s 53A, s 54B Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 37, s 59, s 61I, s 61J Mental Health (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Attorney-General's Application under s 37 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No 1 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 McKechnie v R [2006] NSWCCA 13 Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38 Munn v R [2009] NSWCCA 218 R v Cutrale [2011] NSWCCA 214 R v Daetz; R v Wilson [2003] NSWCCA 216; 139 A Crim R 398 R v HQ [2003] NSWCCA 336 R v MW [2007] NSWCCA 291 Reeves v The Queen [2013] HCA 57 Silvano v R [2008] NSWCCA 118 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Caleb O'Connor (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Wilson SC (Appellant) A Barrie (Respondent) Solicitors: S. Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Appellant) George Sten and Co (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/55401 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Citation: [2013] NSWDC 272 Date of Decision: 2013-11-29 00:00:00 Before: Haesler DCJ File Number(s): 2011/55401
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate