NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Schoupp v Verryt [2014] NSWDC 28 Hearing dates: 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 26 & 28/03/2014 (Last submissions 04/04/2014) Decision date: 14 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Levy SC DCJ Decision: 1.Finding that there was contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff; 2.The respective contributions of the negligence of the parties is apportioned to be 100 per cent on the part of the defendant and 0 per cent on the part of the plaintiff; 3.There should be a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff without discount for contributory negligence; 4.The plaintiff's interim damages arising from his injuries on 30 January 2007 are assessed in the sum of $1,954,150.47 before the addition of the appropriate amount to be added as damages for funds management charges; 5.The parties are to prepare short minutes concerning the issue of funds management and the steps required to finalise the proceedings; 6.Liberty to apply on 7 days notice if further orders are required. Catchwords: TORTS - motor vehicle accident - plaintiff sustained a head injury following a fall onto the roadway after being towed on a skateboard by maintaining a handhold behind defendant's vehicle - breach of duty of care admitted by defendant - finding of contributory negligence on part of plaintiff - on apportionment, plaintiff's contribution assessed at 0 per cent - defendant's contribution assessed at 100 per cent; DAMAGES - assessment of claimed heads of damage - whether there should be an award for funds management charges Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, s 80 Civil Liability Act 2002, s 5D, s 5E, s 5R,s 5S Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 56 - s 58 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965, as amended by the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2000, s 9 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, s 126, s 131, s 136, s 138, s 141B Protected Estates Act 1983 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr [2012] NSWCA 13 Arnott v Choy [2010] NSWCA 259 Axiak v Ingram [2011] NSWSC 1447 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21 Graham v Baker [1961] HCA 48; (1961) 106 CLR 340 Husher v Husher [1999] HCA 47; (1999) 197 CLR 138 Kallouf v Middis [2008] NSWCA 61 Luxton v Vines [1952] HCA 19; (1952) 85 CLR 352 McHale v Watson [1966] HCA 13; (1966) 115 CLR 199 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 20; (1990) 169 CLR 638 Mead v Kerney [2012] NSWCA 215 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission [1995] HCA 5; (1995) 182 CLR 1 Mobbs v Kain [2009] NSWCA 301 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; (1985) 59 ALJR 492; (1985) 59 ALR 529 Rosniak v GIO [1997] 41 NSWLR 608 State of NSW v Gee (aka Michaels) [2002] NSWCA 326 State of NSW v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133; (2000) 54 NSWLR 536 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62; (2005) 223 CLR 442 Wynn v NSW Ministerial Corporation [1995] HCA 53; (1995) 184 CLR 485 Texts Cited: Furzer Crestani Assessment Handbook, 2013 Ed Category: Principal judgment Parties: Liam Luke Schoupp (Plaintiff) Alphonse Verryt (Defendant) Representation: Mr D Campbell SC with Mr S Longhurst (Plaintiff) Mr D Ronzani (Defendant) RMB Lawyers (Plaintiff) Curwoods (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/339964 Wollongong Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate