NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56 Hearing dates: 2 December 2013 Decision date: 15 April 2014 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Johnson J at [1]; Hall J at [1] Decision: 1. Crown appeal allowed. 2. Aggregate sentence imposed at the Parramatta District Court on 4 April 2013 is quashed. 3. In its place, the Respondent is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of nine years and six months commencing on 14 March 2013 and expiring on 13 September 2022, with a balance of term of four years and six months commencing on 14 September 2022 and expiring on 13 March 2027. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - Crown appeal - aggravated sexual intercourse under s.66A(2) Crimes Act 1900 (three counts) - aggravated indecent assault under s.61M(2) Crimes Act 1900 - possess child abuse material under s.91H(2) Crimes Act 1900 - offender 33-year old friend of family of eight-year old victim - offender showed pornographic videos on laptop to victim before commission of offences - digital intercourse and cunnilingus - offences committed over four-month period while offender minding victim and residing in victim's home - substantial quantity of child pornography on offender's laptop and hard drives - no prior criminal history - pleas of guilty - aggregate sentence imposed - head sentence of eight years with non-parole period of five years and four months - Crown asserts sentence manifestly inadequate - significance of increased maximum penalty for s.66A(2) offences - planning and organisation by offender - offender groomed victim in preparation for sexual activity by displaying pornographic videos - exploitation of vulnerable victim by person in authority - importance of harm to child victim - sentence manifestly inadequate - offender resentenced - aggregate sentence comprising head sentence of 14 years with non-parole period of nine years and six months Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences) Act 2008 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1989 Cases Cited: Abbas v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Clarkson v R [2011] VSCA 157; 32 VR 361 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 231 Doe v R [2013] NSWCCA 248 Essex v R [2013] NSWCCA 11 GN v R [2012] NSWCCA 96 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Ibbs v The Queen [1987] HCA 46; 163 CLR 447 Jolly v R [2013] NSWCCA 76 Jones v R [2012] NSWCCA 262 JRM v R [2012] NSWCCA 112 Kertai v R [2013] NSWCCA 252 Leslie v R [2013] NSWCCA 48; 227 A Crim R 133
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate