NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sokolowskyj v Regina [2014] NSWCCA 55 Hearing dates: 01/04/2014 Decision date: 15 April 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [63] Hall J at [64] Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed. (2) The appellant's conviction on 3 August 2012 is quashed. (3) There should be a new trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - assault with an act of indecency upon a person under the age of 10 - whether tendency evidence properly admitted at trial - evidence relevant and capable of proving a tendency - the tendency specified was at a high level of generality - purpose of evidence to rebut likely challenge to Crown case - tendency evidence lacked "significant probative value" - probative value of tendency evidence did not substantially outweigh its prejudicial effect - tendency evidence should have been rejected - conviction quashed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s61M(2) Evidence Act 1995 - s55, s97(1)(b), s101(2), s137 Cases Cited: DAO v R [2011] NSWCCA 63 DJV v R [2008] NSWCCA 272; 200 A Crim R 206 FB v Regina; Regina v FB [2011] NSWCCA 217 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Patel v The Queen [2012] HCA 29; 247 CLR 531 Pfennig v R [1995] HCA 7; 182 CLR 461 Qualtieri v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 95; 171 A Crim R 463` R v Fletcher [2005] NSWCCA 338 R v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 306 R v GAC [2007] NSWCCA 315; 178 A Crim R 408 R v Watkins [2005] NSWCCA 164; 153 A Crim R 434 Regina v Linard Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112; 66 NSWLR 228 Townsend v Townsend [2001] NSWCA 136 Warren v Coombs [1979] HCA 9; 142 CLR 531 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Lawrence Sokolowskj - Appellant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr J Trevallion - Appellant Ms S Herbert - Respondent Crown Solicitors: SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Appellant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2011/078513 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-11-09 00:00:00 Before: Ellis DCJ File Number(s): 2011/078513
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate