NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Irwin (No. 2) [2014] NSWSC 454 Hearing dates: 14 April 2014 Decision date: 17 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Make an extended supervision order, pursuant to s 5C of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (the Act) for a period of five years from the date of this order. 2. Direct, pursuant to s 11 of the Act, that, for the period of the extended supervision order, Mr Irwin comply with the conditions set out in the schedule to these reasons. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW -high risk sex offender - whether continuing detention order required - extended supervision orders - high risk of re-offending - where offender intellectually disabled - paedophilic - multiple failures to comply with supervision and conditions imposed - prospect that anti-libidinal medication will ameliorate risk- untrialled at date of hearing- adequacy of supervision Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61J Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 3, s 5, s 5B, s 5C, s 5D, s 9, s 10, s 11, s 13A, s 17, s 18A, 18D, s 21, s 25B Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 (NSW), s 5 Cases Cited: Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v Gallagher [2006] NSWSC 340 Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v Quinn [2007] NSWSC 873 Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 State of New South Wales v Irwin [2013] NSWSC 1773 Cornwall v Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Scott Lee Irwin (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T Hammond (Plaintiff) M Johnston (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate