NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Arinson Pty Limited v City of Canada Bay Council [2014] NSWLEC 43 Hearing dates: 8-10 April 2014 Decision date: 24 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Biscoe J Decision: (1) The parties, having conferred beforehand, are to email to Biscoe J's Associate their agreed or competing draft orders consistent with these reasons for judgment by 1 May 2014. (2) The proceedings will be listed before Biscoe J on 2 May 2014 to make final orders. (3) The plaintiffs are to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. (4) The exhibits may be returned. Catchwords: EASEMENTS - Imposition of easements Court under s 88K Conveyancing Act 1919 - right of way and easement for services - whether reasonably necessary for effective use or development of dominant tenement - whether use of dominant tenement not inconsistent with the public interest - whether owner of servient tenement can be adequately compensated - whether all reasonable attempts made to obtain easements - whether discretion to make order should be exercised - whether compensation not payable because of special circumstances of the case - quantum of appropriate compensation - valuation approach and adjustments - costs. Legislation Cited: Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan 2008 Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 149B(1) Concord Planning Scheme Ordinance Conveyancing Act 1919 ss 88, 88K Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 55 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 40 Roads Act s 43(4) Strathfield Triangle Development Control Plan 2002 Strathfield Triangle Development Control Plan 2013 Cases Cited: 117 York Street Pty Ltd v Proprietors of Strata Plan No 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504 Arinson Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council, unreported SC of NSW, 21 February 2014 City of Canterbury v Saad [2013] NSWCA 251 Evans v Cornish Nominees Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1295, (2009) 14 BPR 27,257 F & D Bonaccorso Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay City Council [2007] NSWLEC 159 Khattar v Wiese [2005] NSWSC 1014, (2005) 12 BPR 23,235 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 445, (2012) 16 BPR 31,257 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 93 Rainbowforce Pty Ltd v Skyton Holdings Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 2, (2010) 171 LGERA 286 Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167, (2001) 51 NSWLR 589 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Arinson Pty Limited (First Plaintiff) Omaya Holding Pty Limited (Second Plaintiff) Omaya Investments Pty Limited (Third Plaintiff) City of Canada Bay Council (Defendant) Representation: COUNSEL: B Coles QC and M Sahade (Plaintiffs) A Galasso SC and M Izzo (Defendant) SOLICITORS: Sattouts Legal (Plaintiffs) Maddocks Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 40092/14
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate