NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kent v Jacques [2014] NSWSC 469 Hearing dates: 5 April 2013 Decision date: 24 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1)Appeal allowed; (2)Set aside the judgment and orders pronounced on the cross-claim in the Local Court on 18th October 2012 and instead order judgment for the cross-defendant on the cross-claim and order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs in relation to the claim and the cross-claim on the ordinary basis forthwith after they have been agreed or assessed; (3)The defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the appeal on the ordinary basis forthwith after they have been agreed or assessed. Catchwords: APPEAL - civil - local court - professional negligence - whether failure to join further potential defendants negligent - whether evidence to support such a finding Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 65, 100 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 69 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 39 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Cases Cited: Brinn and Jarvis v Russell, Jones & Walker (a firm) [2003] PNLR 16; [2002] EWHC 2727 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid and Anor [2005] HCA 12; (2005) 223 CLR 1; Donnellan v Woodland [2012] NSWCA 433; Fink v Fink (1946) 74 CLR 127; Jacques v Forte Enterprises Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1241; Jacques v Kent (t/as Kent Attorneys) [2012] NSWSC 255; State of New South Wales v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133; (2000) 54 NSWLR 536 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rodney Kent and Tim Orlizki trading as Kent Attorneys (Plaintiff) Philip Jacques (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J T Gibson (Plaintiff) D Lloyd (Defendant Solicitors: Kent Attorneys (Plaintiff) Dominic Sisinni (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/350197
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate