NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bova v Pharmacy Council of NSW [2014] NSWCATOD 40 Hearing dates: 17 April 2014 Decision date: 29 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Boland AM ADJC, Principal Member Decision: Application for access to email communications constituting meeting of Pharmacy Council of NSW dismissed. Catchwords: APPLICATION - Summons. Whether access to documents should be denied as irrelevant to an appeal, nature of an appeal under s 159 of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, whether applicant has demonstrated genuine forensic purpose, whether Council deliberations inadmissible under s 129 or s 130 of the Evidence Act 1995. Whether documents attract legal professional privilege under s 118, of the Evidence Act. HELD - Applicant has not satisfied onus that documents relevant or genuine forensic purpose established. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Evidence Act 1994 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) No 86a Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alister v R (1984) 154 CLR 404 Attorney-General for NSW v Chidgey [2008] NSWCCA 65 Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Camacho v Psychology Tribunal of NSW[2011] NSWPT 1 Dorajay Pty Ltd v Aristocrat Leisure Limited (unreported) 13 May 2005 I v Medical Board of Australia [2011] SAHPT 18 Kozanoglu v Pharmacy Board of Australia [2012] VSCA 295 McMahon v Nursing and Midwifery Council of NSW [2013] NSWNMT 4 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 724 Modern Woodcraft Pty Ltd v Nott NSWSC (unreported 7 March 1997) Perceval v Nursing and Midwifery Council of NSW [2011] NSWNMT 20 Petitt v Dunkley [1971] NSWLR 376 Portal Software v Bodsworth [2005] NSWSC115 QQ v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2011] NSWADT 54 QQ v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (No 2) [2011] NSWADT 79 Ryan & Anor v Watkins & Anor [2005] NSWCA 426 The State of New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation [2011] NSWCA 60 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Limited (1989) 88 ALR 90 Texts Cited: Uniform Evidence Law 10th ed Stephen Odgers Thomson Reuters. Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Nicholas Patrick Bova (Applicant/Appellant) Pharmacy Council of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr James Sleight (Applicant) Mr P Ginters (Respondent) Schofield King Lawyers (Applicant/Appellant) Pharmacy Council of NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 1420106
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate