NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gould v Purtle [2014] NSWSC 493 Hearing dates: 23 April 2014 Decision date: 23 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Hallen J Decision: See Paragraph 60 of these reasons Catchwords: SUCCESSION - Failure by Plaintiff to comply with family provision order which order was made by consent of the parties - Whether additional orders may be made following the orders being entered by recording them in the court's computerised court record system - Orders may be made for the for the purpose of giving effect to the family provision order and which do not involve a variation to the substantive orders made by agreement of the parties.
PROCEDURE - Non-appearance by the Plaintiff at the hearing - UCPR rule 29.7 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ciavarella v Polimeni [2008] NSWSC 541 Jeloudev v Lohman [2010] NSWSC 1229 Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd v J Aron Corporation and the Goldman Sachs Group Inc [2007] NSWCA 195; (2007) 70 NSWLR 411 NSW Trustee & Guardian as Executor of the Will of Michael Robert Walsh (Deceased) v Gregory [2012] NSWSC 681 Phillips v Walsh (1990) 20 NSWLR 206 Raulfs v Fishy Bite Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1732 Smirski v Macander [2010] NSWSC 929 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Georgia Anne Gould (Plaintiff) Donna Lea Purtle (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/19025
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate