NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Xie (No 4) [2014] NSWSC 500 Hearing dates: 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 25 November 2013; 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 31 March 2014; 1 and 14 April 2014 Decision date: 30 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: The Crown is granted leave to rely upon the further material from Dr Perlin served on the Accused on 3 March 2014.
The Accused's Notice of Motion dated 18 November 2013 is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - pretrial rulings - indictment alleging five counts of murder - victims were relatives of Accused's wife killed in their sleep with blunt instrument and by asphyxia - defence objections to several categories of evidence to be led at trial - whether evidence in relation to possible blood stain found on Accused's garage floor relevant and admissible - whether subsequent DNA analysis of stain relevant and admissible - whether DNA analysis evidence should be excluded under Evidence Act 1995, ss.135 or 137 - whether Crown ought be granted leave to rely on additional report of DNA expert - whether evidence of Accused cutting up shoe boxes improperly obtained for purposes of Evidence Act 1995, s.138 and should be excluded - objections to evidence overruled - leave granted to rely on additional report of DNA expert Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Jury Act 1977 New South Wales Crime Commission Act 1985 Cases Cited: Armstrong v R [2013] NSWCCA 113 Aytugrul v R [2010] NSWCCA 157; 205 A Crim R 157 Aytugrul v The Queen [2012] HCA 15; 247 CLR 170 BJS v R [2013] NSWCCA 123; 231 A Crim R 537 California v Lawton, Langston and Harper (unreported, Superior Court of California (Kern County), 1 October 2013) Commonwealth of Virginia v Brady (unreported, Virginia Circuit Court, 17 December 2013) Commonwealth v Foley (2012) 38 A.3d 882 Dasreef Pty Limited v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21; 243 CLR 588 Davidson v R [2009] NSWCCA 150; 75 NSWLR 150 De Gruchy v The Queen [2002] HCA 33; 211 CLR 85 Director of Public Prosecutions v AM [2006] NSWSC 348; 161 A Crim R 219 Dyldam Developments Pty Limited v Jones [2008] NSWCA 56 Evans v The Queen [2007] HCA 59; 235 CLR 521 Festa v The Queen [2001] HCA 72; 208 CLR 693 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 R (Cth) v Petroulias (No. 8) [2007] NSWSC 82 R v Basha (1989) 39 A Crim R 337 R v Broughton (unreported, Oxford Crown Court, 29 June 2010) R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335; 237 A Crim R 238 R v Clark [2001] NSWCCA 494; 123 A Crim R 506 R v Cornwell [2003] NSWSC 97; 57 NSWLR 82 R v Dalley (2002) 132 A Crim R 169 R v Dlugosz and Ors [2013] EWCA Crim 2; [2013] 1 Cr App R 32 R v Duffy and Shivers [2012] NICC 1 R v Fuller [2013] SADC 150 R v Gallagher [2001] NSWSC 462 R v Gilmore [1977] 2 NSWLR 935 R v Karger [2001] SASC 64; 83 SASR 1 R v Le [2000] NSWCCA 49 R v McIntryre [2001] NSWSC 311 R v MK [2012] NSWCCA 110; 223 A Crim R 572 R v Ngo [2001] NSWSC 595; 122 A Crim R 467 R v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 9 R v Reed [2009] EWCA Crim 2698; [2010] 1 Cr App R 23 R v Sood [2007] NSWCCA 214 R v Suteski [2002] NSWCCA 509 R v Vjestica [2008] VSCA 47; 182 A Crim R 350 R v Xie (No. 3) [2013] NSWSC 1840 Ridgeway v The Queen [1995] HCA 66; 184 CLR 19 Robinson v Woolworths Limited [2005] NSWCCA 426; 64 NSWLR 612 SD v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] NSWCA 48; 84 NSWLR 456 Shepherd v The Queen [1990] HCA 56; 170 CLR 573 Smith v The Queen [2001] HCA 50; 206 CLR 650 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Lian Bin (Robert) Xie (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Tedeschi AM QC; Ms KN Shead (Crown) Mr GW Turnbull SC; Mr L Fernandez (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate