NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: HP Mercantile Pty Ltd v Clements [2014] NSWSC 509 Hearing dates: 12, 14 and 20 March 2014 Decision date: 02 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Orders made for proceedings to be dismissed and parties to be heard as to costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS - construction - loan agreements - where defendant entered into managed agricultural investment scheme and executed loan agreements with initial managing entity of the scheme - where rights to debt owed by defendant was assigned to plaintiff under sequence of assignments - where plaintiff has demanded repayment of relevant principal sum and interest - whether assignor had incurred harvesting and marketing costs under relevant agreement - whether it can be established that a particular amount is owed by defendant in respect of such costs - whether defendant made income from interest in project available in its entirety to relevant representative under loan agreements - whether limited recourse provision in loan agreement ceased to have effect - whether default occurred under loan agreements. PROCEDURE - where plaintiff now claims different amount of harvesting and marketing costs from amount originally pleaded on basis of different evidence - no amendment application made - whether defendant would suffer real prejudice by change in plaintiff's claim.
WORDS AND PHRASES - "income" - "made available". Legislation Cited: - Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 111 - Bills of Exchange and Other Instruments Act 1955 (QLD) - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 9 - Corporations Law s 9 - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 69, 136 Cases Cited: - Associated Alloys Pty Ltd v ACN 001 452 106 Pty Ltd [2000] HCA 25; (2000) 202 CLR 588 - Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63; 98 ER 969 - Carlow Castle Pty Ltd trading as Greenhill Capital Partners v Aztec Resources Ltd [2014] NSWCA 123 - Cinema Plus Ltd (admin apptd) v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2000] NSWCA 195; (2000) 49 NSWLR 513 - Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) [1982] HCA 24; (1982) 149 CLR 337 - Current Images Pty Ltd v Dupack Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 99 - Gosling v McCombie [1972] HCA 40; (1972) 126 CLR 487 - Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 - Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Ltd v JPT Re Ltd [2006] NSWCA 207 - McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd [2000] HCA 65; (2000) 203 CLR 579 - Optus Vision Pty Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd [2004] NSWCA 61 - Osborne Computer Corporation Pty Ltd v Airroad Distribution Pty Ltd (1995) 37 NSWLR 382; 17 ACSR 614 - Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas [2004] HCA 35; (2004) 218 CLR 451 - Re Price; ex parte Tinning (1931) 26 Tas LR 158 - Re Trendent Industries Pty Ltd (in liq) (1983) 8 ACLR 115; 1 ACLC 980 - Seka Pty Ltd (in prov liq) v Fabric Dyeworks (Aust) Pty Ltd (1991) 28 FCR 574; 4 ACSR 455 - Thompson v Smith [1976] HCA 56; (1976) 135 CLR 102 - Western Export Services Inc v Jireh International Pty Ltd [2011] HCA 45; (2011) 282 ALR 604 Texts Cited: - Peter Butt, Land Law (6th ed 2010, Thomson Reuters) Category: Principal judgment Parties: HP Mercantile Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Phillip Clements (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P M Knowles (Plaintiff) (12 and 14 March); J Simpkins SC/P M Knowles (20 March) C R C Newlinds SC/A d'Arville (Defendant) Solicitors: Versace McKenzie Lawyers (Plaintiff) Legal & Commercial Solutions (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/289202
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate