NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 25) [2014] NSWSC 518 Decision date: 23 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Reasons published Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE - damages arising from death - damages for nervous shock - son of two plaintiffs killed on school excursion - whether parents suffered mental harm - pre-existing psychiatric conditions - costs of coronial inquest - whether plaintiff entitled to such costs - two plaintiffs sole directors and shareholders of two plaintiff companies - companies make per quod amisit sevitium claim - whether claim falls within exception in Barclay v Penberthy - failure to mitigate Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1981 (UK) Cases Cited: AMP General Insurance Ltd v Kull [2005] NSWCA 442 Baghdadi bht Kouri v P & M Quality Smallgoods Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 406 Barclay v Penberthy [2012] HCA 40; (2012) 246 CLR 258 BestCare Foods Ltd v Origin Energy LPG Ltd (formerly Boral Gas (NSW) Pty Ltd) [2013] NSWSC 1287 Chaina v The Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust [2008] NSWSC 290 Chaina v The Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 1056 Chaina v The Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No 3) [2009] NSWSC 1243 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No 6) [2012] NSWSC 1476 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No 7) [2013] NSWSC 139 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No 8) [2013] NSWSC 187 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 13) [2013] NSWSC 1057 Chaina v The Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 15) [2013] 1178 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 16) [2013] NSWSC 1494 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 22) [2013] NSWSC 1707 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No 23) [2013] NSWSC 1675 Chen v Karandonis [2002] NSWCA 412 Cremona v Roads and Traffic Authority [2000] NSWSC 735 Cremona v Roads and Traffic Authority [2000] NSWSC 556 Dell v Dalton (1991) 23 NSWLR 528 Giorginis v Kastrati (1988) 49 SASR 371 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Hollier v Sutcliffe [2010] NSWSC 279 McCrohon v Harith [2010] NSWCA 67 Paino v Paino (2008) 40 Fam LR 96 Petrovski v Serco Sodexo Defence Services Pty Ltd [2013] ACTSC 242 Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No. 2) [1982] Ch 204 Roach v Home Office; Matthews v Home Office [2009] EWHC 312; [2010] QB 256 Roads Traffic Authority v Cremona [2001] NSWCA 338 Roads Traffic Authority v Cremona (No. 2) [2001] NSWCA 459 Saad v Gosford City Council [2007] NSWSC 643 Sydney Attractions Group Pty Ltd v Schulman (No. 2) [2013] 1153 Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited [2002] HCA 35; (2002) 211 CLR 317 Thornton v Wollondilly Mobile Engineering [2012] NSWSC 621 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Chaina (Second Plaintiff) Rita Chaina (Third Plaintiff) Proton Technology Pty Ltd (Fourth Plaintiff) Deluxe Technology Pty Ltd (Fifth Plaintiff) The Presbyterian Church (New South Wales) Property Trust (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Maconachie QC & J Sharpe (Plaintiffs) [4 March - 12 April 2013] A Dawson (Plaintiffs) [8, 9, 14, 15 & 16 October 2013] Rita Chaina and George Chaina (Plaintiffs) 15 July 2013 - 20 December 2013 R Stitt QC, G L Turner & H Stitt (Defendant) Solicitors: Berrigan Doube Lawyers (Plaintiffs) [4 March - 12 April 2013] Rita Chaina and George Chaina (Plaintiffs) 15 July 2013 - 20 December 2013 Curwoods Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2002/69354
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate