NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aus Steel Pty Ltd v Marco Properties Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 550 Hearing dates: 2 May 2014 Decision date: 02 May 2014 Before: Ball J Decision: (1) Summons dismissed. (2) Plaintiff pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - whether plaintiff satisfied conditions for an order for preliminary discovery - whether application brought for a proper purpose Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Property Law Act 1974 (Qld) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) Cases Cited: Glencore International AG v Selwyn Mines Ltd [2005] FCA 801; (2005) 223 ALR 238 Hatfield v TCN Channel 9 [2010] NSWCA 69; (2010) 77 NSWLR 506 Hornsby Shire Council v Valuer General of NSW [2008] NSWSC 1179 Noble Earth Technologies Pty Ltd v Hampic Pty Ltd t/a Cyndan Chemicals [2012] NSWSC 935 Panasonic Australia Pty Ltd v Ngage Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 399 Papaconstuntinos v Holmes à Court [2006] NSWSC 945 St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd [2004] FCA 1360; (2004) 211 ALR 147 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aus Steel Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Marco Properties Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Marco Engineering Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Marco Group Holdings Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Jacobs (Plaintiff) JC Giles (Defendants) Solicitors: Harris Wheeler (Plaintiff) McMahon Clarke (Defendants) File Number(s): 2014/2037 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate