NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jamsapi Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCATAD 57 Hearing dates: 10 February 2014 Decision date: 08 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Verick, Senior Member Decision: The land tax assessments under review are affirmed Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES - Land Tax - whether land exempt from taxation as land used for primary production - whether the applicant failed to discharge onus of proof - whether the applicant failed the dominant use test Legislation Cited: Taxation Administration Act 1996 Land Tax Management Act 1956 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Leda Manorstead Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWSC 867 Saville v Commissioner of Land Tax (1980) 12 ATR 7 Hope v Bathurst City Council (No 2) (1984) 52 LGRA 79 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1986) 7 NSWLR 669 Thomason v Chief Executive, Department of Lands (1994-1995) 15 QLCR 286 Greenville Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Land Tax (1977) 7 ATR 278 Cornish Investments Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWADTAP 25 Cornish Investments Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] NSWADT 204 Krew v Federal Commissioner of Tax 71 ATC 4213 Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWADT 46 Jamsapi Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWADT 202 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jamsapi Pty Ltd (Applicant) The Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel K Day (Respondent) B Anstee (Agent for the Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 126002, 126100 and 136053
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate