NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mushroom Composters v Robertson (No.2) [2014] NSWSC 552 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 12 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: Judgment for cross-claimant in the sum of $1,566,206.00. Cross-defendant to pay cross-claimant's costs of the action and the cross-claim Catchwords: DAMAGES - general principles - difficulty of assessing damages where future or hypothetical events- whether total absence of reliable evidence of company's financial affairs - whether methodology for quantifying losses was sound
DAMAGES - where successful claims by both parties - application of Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 90(2)(a) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Camellia Properties Pty Ltd v Wesfarmers General Insurance Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1975 Troulis v Vamvoukakis [1998] NSWCA 237 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Mushroom Composters Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) IS & DE Robertson Family Trust (Defendant/Cross Claimant) Representation: Counsel: GA Sirtes SC / SJ Duggan (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) B F Katekar (Defendant/Cross Claimant) Solicitors: Curtis Delaney Gray (Plaintiff) Henry Davis York (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/20925
Judgment 1HIS HONOUR: In reasons given on 4 March 2014 ([2014] NSWSC 164), I concluded that the plaintiff (Composters) succeeded in part on its claim and that the defendant (Robertson) succeeded in part on its cross-claim. 2There was no difficulty in quantifying the damages to which, on my findings, Composters was entitled. The figure was $27,815.00, exclusive of GST and before interest.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate