NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tepazo Pty Limited v Lane Cove Council [2014] NSWLEC 1078 Hearing dates: 30 April, 1-2 May 2014 Decision date: 09 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Residential Flat Building: Height, bulk and scale, impacts on adjoining properties, compliance with planning controls. Legislation Cited: Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009; State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 - Design Quality of Residential Flat Development; State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index BASIX) 2004; State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007; Land and Environment Court Act 1979; State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 - Development Standards; Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cases Cited: Seaside Property Developments Pty Ltd v Wyong Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 117 Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827; Texts Cited: Lane Cove Development Control Plan 2009; Residential Flat Design Code; Building Code of Australia Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tepazo Pty Limited (Applicant)
Lane Cove Council (Respondent) Representation: Ms S Duggan SC (Applicant) Gadens Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr A Seton Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 10062 of 2014
Judgment 1Tepazo Pty Limited lodged development application D205/13 with Lane Cove Council on 20 December 2013 seeking consent for the demolition of existing buildings and construction of a residential flat building at 390-398 Pacific Highway, Lane Cove. The application was refused consent and Tepazo is appealing that decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate