NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DSJ v R; NS v R [2014] NSWCCA 77 Hearing dates: 3 September 2013 Decision date: 13 May 2014 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Hidden J at [212]; Rothman J at [213] Decision: 2010/34654 (DSJ v R) Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 2010/40493 (NS v R) Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL- Appeal - General principles - Right of appeal -When appeal lies - From interlocutory decisions - Leave to appeal CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal - Interlocutory orders - Section 5F(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - Interlocutory order not to order separate trials - Application of Section 21 Criminal Procedure Act - Question of admissibility of evidence central to decision of primary judge - Admissibility of coincidence evidence - Section 98 and 101 Evidence Act 1995 - Whether leave ought to be granted Legislation Cited: Constitution s 80 Corporations Act 2001, s1042A, 1043A Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s5F Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s21 Evidence Act 1995, s55, 97, 98, 101 and 137 Cases Cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc [1981] HCA 39; 148 CLR 170 DAO v R [2011] NSWCCA 63; 81 NSWLR 568 De Jesus v R [1986] HCA 65; 68 ALR 1 DPP v Boardman [1975] AC 421 DPP v Kilbourne [1973] AC 729 DSJ v R; NS v R [2011] NSWCCA 222 DSJ v R; NS v R [2012] NSWSC 409 DSJ v R; NS v R [2012] NSWCCA 9; 84 NSWLR 758 Hoch v The Queen (1998) 165 CLR 292 Holborn v Guardians of Union Chertsey (1884) 15 QBD 76 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 In re the Will of F B Gilbert (deceased) (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 Kocer v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 328 Ludlow v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1971] AC 29 Maxwell v Keun [1928] 1 KB 645 Noor Mohamed v The King [1949] AC 182 Peterborough v Overseers of the Parish of Wilsthorpe (1883) 12 QBD 1 Queanbeyan City Council v Environment Protection Authority [2011] NSWCCA 108 R v DSJ; R v NS [2011] NSWSC 894 R v DSJ; R v NS (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 471 R v DSJ; R v NS (No 4) [2013] NSWSC 472 R v DSJ; R v NS (No 5) [2013] NSWSC 473 R v Einfeld [2008] NSWCCA 215; 71 NSWLR 31 R v Ellis [2003] NSWCCA 319; 58 NSWLR 700 R v Frazer [2002] NSWCCA 59; 128 A Crim R 89 R v Gale; R v Duckworth [2012] NSWCCA 174; 217 A Crim R 487 R v Georgiou [1999] NSWCCA 125 R v JGW [1999] NSWCCA 116 R v Lock (1997) 91 A Crim R 356 R v Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R 457 R v Powch (1988) 14 NSWLR 136 R v Smith [1981] 1 NSWLR 193 R v Steffan (1993) 30 NSWLR 633 R v Van Phu Ho (NSWCCA, 18 July 1994, unreported) Re Lamb [1894] 2 QB 805 Sali v SPC Ltd (1993) 67 ALJR 841 Saunders v R (1994) 72 A Crim R 347 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 175 CLR 573 Sutton v R [1984] HCA 5; 152 CLR 528 Verma v R (1987) 30 A Crim R 441 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CCA 2010/34654 (DSJ v R) DSJ (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate