NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v Sztrochlic [2014] NSWSC 576 Hearing dates: 2 May 2014 Decision date: 02 May 2014 Before: McCallum J Decision: The defendant's application is rejected. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the defendant's notice of motion filed 3 April 2014 as agreed or assessed on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - pleadings - application to have pleadings struck out - whether pleadings have the tendency to cause prejudice, embarrassment or delay - whether it is necessary to strike out the proceedings in the interests of justice Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Arthur Young v Tieco International (Australia) Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of South Australia, Lander J, 19 July 1995, unreported) Ingot v Macquarie [2004] NSWSC 1136 McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC1424 Northam v Favelle Favco Holdings Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Bryson J, 7 March 1995, unreported) Texts Cited: William Blake Odgers, Odgers on Pleading and Practice, 8th ed (1918) Stevens and Sons at 178 - 210. Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Baiada Poultry Pty Limited (plaintiff) Raphael Sztrochlic (defendant) Representation: Counsel: T Maltz (plaintiff) P Biber (solicitor for defendant) Solicitors: Coleman and Greig Lawyers (plaintiff) David Landa Stewart (defendant) File Number(s): 2013/255115 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate