NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Burns v Sunol [2014] NSWCATAD 62 Hearing dates: 13 November 2013 Decision date: 14 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: N Hennessy LCM, Deputy President A Lowe, General Member M Nasir, General Member Decision: 1. The following publications constitute homosexual vilification: (a) the image of a video clip "Antichrist in Chief" with a graphic of a man sodomising another man in conjunction with the following comment from Mr Sunol: "Thank god for Russia's Fag law. Russia has a law that bars the public discussion of gay rights and relationships anywhere near children. And Antichrist Obama doesn't like it." (b) the words, "I agree with Fred over this, lets pray for Salvation from God and know that the Russian people are good people and they have got it right with the GLSBT and Rainbow people who are in very evil groups driving by the devil to create troubles. " (c )the image of a video clip "DEATH PENALTY 4 FAGS" with the comment "All nations should follow God in requiring the death penalty for sodomy" and (d) the image of a video clip entitled "GOD H8S FAG MARRIAGE" and the comment that "I agree with this as God not only hates gay marriage, Gay Marriage is an abomination to Him ..." (2) The following complaints of victimisation are substantiated: The passages in bold set out at 36 above. The passages in the letters dated 29 July 2013, 26 August 2013, 2 September 2013, 4 September 2013 and 16 September 2013 reproduced as [37]. (3) Within 14 days of the date of this decision, Mr Sunol is to remove the unlawful material identified in Orders 1 and 2 from every website controlled by him and all material to the same or similar effect. (4) Mr Sunol is to refrain from publishing the material described in Orders 1 and 2 or material to the same or similar effect, on any website, controlled by him. (5) Within 14 days of the date of this decision, Mr Sunol is to post the following apology on every website controlled by him: This apology is made pursuant to orders of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) made on 14 May 2014. On 11 August 2013, I published statements on a website controlled by me: www.johnsunol.blogspot.com.au several comments concerning homosexuality and homosexual people. On 14 May 2014 NCAT held that my statements amounted to unlawful homosexual vilification. NCAT found that they were capable, or had the effect, of inciting hatred or serious contempt of one or more homosexual people on the ground of their homosexuality. I apologise for publishing these statements. I acknowledge that the words that I used vilified homosexuals in breach of the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. The aim of this Act is to promote tolerance, understanding and acceptance in the community. The Act sets limits on what can be said or done in public. (6) In default of compliance with Orders 3, 4 or 5 within the specified time, Mr Sunol is to pay Mr Burns damages of $2,500 for breach of any of those Orders. (7) Within 28 days Mr Sunol is to pay Mr Burns damages in the sum of $1,000 for the homosexual vilification. (8) Within 28 days Mr Sunol is to pay Mr Burns $5,000 for the victimisation. (9) Within 14 days of the date of this decision Mr Sunol is to post a signed letter of apology in the terms set out below to Mr Burns as follows: Mr Gary Burns PO Box 77 PADDINGTON NSW 2021 Dear Mr Burns The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal, in a decision dated 14May 2014 entitled Burns v Sunol, has found me to be in breach of provisions of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 which state that victimisation, as defined in those provisions, is unlawful. I offer my apologies for that behaviour. Yours faithfully John Sunol (10) In default of compliance with Orders 7, 8 or 9 within the specified time, Mr Sunol is to pay Mr Burns damages of $2,500 for breach of any of those Orders. (11) This matter is to be re-listed on 9 July 2014 at 10.00 am to determine whether Mr Sunol has complied with these Orders. Catchwords: ANTI-DISCRIMINATION - racial vilification and victimisation - remedies Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Burns v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWADT 267 Burns v Sunol (No 2) [2012] NSWADT 247 Burns v Sunol (No 2) [2014] NSWCATAD 44 Burns v Sunol [2012] NSWADT 246 Burns v Sunol [2014] NSWCATAD 2 Collier v Sunol [2005] NSWADT 261 Jones v Toben [2002] FCA 1150 Jones v Trad [2013] NSWCA 389 Nicholls and Nicholls v Director General, Department of Education and Training (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 20 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Garry Burns (Applicant) John Sunol (Respondent) Representation: G Burns (Applicant in person) J Sunol (Respondent in person) File Number(s): 131095
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate