NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wootton v R [2014] NSWCCA 86 Hearing dates: 13 May 2014 Decision date: 21 May 2014 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] RA Hulme J at [2] Campbell J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - appeal against sentence - natural justice - procedural fairness - whether finding that gun crimes are on the rise without giving an opportunity to make submissions on the point constituted a denial of procedural fairness
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - appeal against sentence - whether no evidence to support the finding that gun crimes are becoming increasingly prevalent Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 112 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; El Masri v R [2014] NSWCCA 13; House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R (2011) 31 VR 673; [2011] VSCA 32; R v H (1980) 3 A Crim R 53; R v House [2005] NSWCCA 88; R v MacNeil-Brown (2008) 20 VR 677; [2008] VSCA 190; Trajkovski v The Queen [2011] VSCA 170 WCB v The Queen (2010) 2 VR 483 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Wootton (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Brady (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent) Solicitors: Nyman Gibson Stewart (Applicant) Solicitors for Public Prosecution (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/294414 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-01-31 00:00:00 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2010/294414
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate