NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sakkara Investment Holdings Pty Ltd as trustee for Sakkara Landings Trust v The Residents Committee, The Landings and The Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of New South Wales [2014] NSWSC 610 Hearing dates: 16 May 2014 Decision date: 19 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Sackar J Decision: See paragraphs [58]-[59] Catchwords: EQUITY - application for judicial review of orders made by Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal - summons filed out of time - motion to extend time pursuant to UCPR r 59.10 - where review originally sought in District Court within relevant time period - exercise of discretion to extend time - where lack of satisfactory explanation as to delay - where lack of practical utility - where difficulty in identifying jurisdictional error on an impressionistic basis Legislation Cited: Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 Retirement Villages Act 1999 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Bindah v Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1290 Boral Gas (NSW) Pty Ltd v Magill (1993) 32 NSWLR 501 Hickey v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1983) 72 FLR 291 Jackmarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 Ketteman v Hansel Properties Ltd [1987] AC 189 Krishna v Lovett [2011] NSWCA 354 Mauger v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2013] NSWSC 1587 Obieta v Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal NSW [2009] NSWCA 220 R v Epping & Harlow General Commissioners; Ex parte Goldstraw [1983] 3 All ER 257 R v Hillingdon London Borough Council; Ex parte Royco Homes Ltd [1974] QB 720 at 728 R v Ross Jones; Ex parte Green (1984) 156 CLR 185 at 214 State Water Corporation v Civil Team Engineering Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1879 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sakkara Investments Holdings Pty Limited ATF Sakkara Landings Trust - applicant The Residents Committee, The Landings - first respondent The Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal of NSW - second respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr M Galvin (applicant) Mr P Hill (solicitor) (first respondent) Solicitors: Gadens Lawyers (applicant) Hill and Co Lawyers (first respondent) File Number(s): 2013/382710
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate