NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RJA v R [2014] NSWCCA 89 Hearing dates: 15 May 2014 Decision date: 15 May 2014 Before: Basten JA at [29]; R A Hulme J at [1]; Campbell J at [30] Decision: 1. Allow the appeal. 2. Quash the sentences imposed by the Court of Criminal Appeal on 10 June 2008. 3. Re-sentence the appellant as follows: Count 3 - sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 4 years 6 months and a balance of the term of the sentence of 1 year 6 months. The sentence will date from 18 August 2006. The non-parole period expired on 17 February 2011 and the total term expired on 17 August 2012. Count 4 - sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 7 years 6 months and a balance of the term of the sentence of 2 years 6 months. The sentence will date from 18 August 2007. The non-parole period will expire on 17 February 2015 and the total term will expire on 17 August 2017. Count 1 - sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 9 years and a balance of the term of the sentence of 4 years. The sentence will date from 18 August 2008. The appellant will become eligible for release on parole upon the expiration of the non-parole period on 17 August 2017. The total term will expire on 17 August 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - referral pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - Muldrock error conceded - standard-non parole period remains important guidepost where offence is in mid-range of objective seriousness - when not given determinative significance, lesser sentences warranted - appeal upheld and new sentences imposed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: AB v R [2013] NSWCCA 273 Dousha v R [2008] NSWCCA 263 Filippou v R [2013] NSWCCA 92 Koh v R [2013] NSWCCA 287 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 195 R v PGM [2008] NSWCCA 172; 187 A Crim R 152 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 RJA v R [2008] NSWCCA 137; 185 A Crim R 178 RS v R [2013] NSWCCA 227 Ryan v R [2001] HCA 21; 206 CLR 267 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RJA (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I McLachlan (Appellant) Ms S Herbert (Crown) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2004/8249 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2006-08-18 00:00:00 Before: Finnane QC DCJ File Number(s): 04/31/0470
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate