NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lavin v Toppi [2014] NSWCA 160 Hearing dates: 5 May 2014 Decision date: 23 May 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Emmett JA at [2]; Leeming JA at [11] Decision: Appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: EQUITY - contribution between co-sureties - co-surety discharged less of borrower's indebtedness than another and obtained covenant not to sue from Bank - whether liability no longer "co-ordinate" with other co-surety - whether other co-surety's payment conferred benefit on first surety - whether dismissal of Bank's proceedings meant no longer co-ordinate liabilities - whether Carr v Thomas [2009] NSWCA 208 clearly wrong - whether disentitling conduct Legislation Cited: Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (UK) Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), Part 4 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 90, 91 Judicature Act 1873 (UK), s 25(11) Law Reform (Law and Equity) Act 1972 (NSW), s 5 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), s 5 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 36.11(2) Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), s 24AA Cases Cited: Albion Insurance Co Ltd v Government Insurance Office of NSW [1969] HCA 55; 121 CLR 342 Armstrong v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1969) 69 SR (NSW) 38 Bank of Adelaide v Lorden (1970) 127 CLR 185 Baxter v Obacelo Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 66; 205 CLR 635 Bonner v Tottenham and Edmonton Permanent Investment Building Society [1899] 1 QB 161 Brighton v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2011] NSWCA 152 Burke v LFOT Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 17; 209 CLR 282 Carr v Thomas [2009] NSWCA 208 Commercial Bank of Tasmania v Jones [1893] AC 313 Craythorne v Swinburne (1807) 14 Ves 162; 33 ER 482 Deanplan Ltd v Mahmoud [1993] Ch 151 Duck v Mayeu [1892] 2 QB 511 Duncan, Fox & Co v North and South Wales Bank (1880) 6 App Cas 1 Falcke v Scottish Imperial Insurance Company (1886) 34 Ch D 234 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 239 CLR 89 Friend v Brooker [2009] HCA 21; 239 CLR 129 Gladman Commercial Properties v Fisher Hargreaves Proctor [2013] EWCA Civ 1466 Hancock v Williams (1942) 42 SR (NSW) 252 HIH Claims Support Ltd v Insurance Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 31; 244 CLR 72 Johnson v Davies [1999] Ch 117 McDermott v Black (1940) 63 CLR 161 Murray-Oates v Jjadd Pty Ltd [1999] SASC 537; 76 SASR 38 Pollak v National Australia Bank Ltd [2002] FCA 237 Pritchard v DJZ Constructions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 196 Robinson v Tait [2002] 2 NZLR 30 Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] HCA 15 Thompson v Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 574 Tucker v Bennett (1927) 60 OLR 118; [1927] 2 DLR 42 Watts v Aldington [1999] L&TR 578 Texts Cited: Raoul Colinvaux (ed), Carver's Carriage by Sea, (13th ed, 1982) Vol 2 Digest of Justinian, 14.2, 46.1.17, 46.1.39 D Foskett, The Law and Practice of Compromise, (7th ed 2010, Sweet & Maxwell) Institutes of Justinian, 3.20.4 Sir Nathaniel Lindley, The Law of Partnership, (4th ed 1878, Sweet & Maxwell) D Marks and G Moss (eds), Rowlatt on Principal and Surety, (6th ed 2011, Sweet & Maxwell) Glanville Williams, Joint Obligations, (1949, Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dolores Lavin (First Appellant) Dolores Lavin Management Pty Limited (Second Appellant) Paola Toppi (First Respondent) Neil Cunningham (Second Respondent) Basecove Pty Limited (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Einfeld QC with S Golledge (Appellants) M R Pesman SC (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate