NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Supit v White [2013] NSWLC 27 Hearing dates: 28/08/2013 Decision date: 10 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Assessor Olischlager Decision: Pre-judgment interest allowed pursuant to section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEEDINGS - pre-judgment interest - assessment of damages - loss of use Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Anthanasopolous v Moseley [2001] 52 NSWLR 262 Bunnings Group Limited v CHEP Australia Limited [2011] NSWCA 342 Fang v Koumoukelis [2013] NSWLC 5 Grincelis v House [2000] HCA 42 Haines v Bendall (1991) 172 CLR 60 Harb v Marchbank [2011] NSWLC 9 Masrour v Danzey (Local Court, Schurr LCM, 12 April 2013, unrep*) Screenco Pty Limited v R L Dew Pty Limited & Anor [2003] NSWCA 319 Stanilite Pacific Ltd (in liq) & Anor v Seaton and Ors (No2) [2005] NSWCA 412 Strand Electric and Engineering Co Ltd v Brisford Entertainments Ltd [1952] 2 QB 246 The Owners Strata Plan 57504 v Building Insurers' Guarantee Corporation [2008] NSWSC 1285 The Northumbria (1969) LR3A&E 6 Wenham v Ella [1972] HCA 43; (1972) 127 CLR 454 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Karl Supit (plaintiff) Chris White (defendant) Representation: Mr D'Arcy (for the plaintiff) Mr Fernie (for the defendant) File Number(s): 2013/128738 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate