NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Highbury Group Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2014] NSWLEC 1094 Hearing dates: 19 May 2014 Decision date: 20 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: 1.The appeal is upheld. 2.The application under s 96(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify, under s 96(2), the development consent DA 126/2011 for the construction of a residential flat building at 4 West Street, Balgowlah, is determined by approving the modifications subject to the changes to the conditions of development consent; 3.As a consequence of order (2), Development Consent No DA 126/2011 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in Annexure A; and 4.The exhibits, other than Exhibits 1, A and B, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT CONSENT- amend consent for residential flat building to increase number of units. Whether increase in height, floor space ratio and density of the proposal is acceptable. Resident concerns. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Land and Environment Court Act Manly Local Environmental Plan 2013 State Environmental Planning Policy - Design Quality of Residential Flat Development State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 Cases Cited: Aleksandar Design Group Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2012] NSWLEC 1339 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Highbury Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Manly Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr M Staunton (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate