NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Limited [2014] NSWSC 672 Hearing dates: 15 May 2014 Decision date: 16 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Bergin CJ in Eq Decision: Injunction granted Catchwords: [INJUNCTIONS] - where adverse findings made in respect of respondent's conduct in receiving assets knowing it was for purpose of putting them beyond the reach of the liquidator and persons claiming an entitlement - whether findings proper basis for granting injunction. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) (25.14) Cases Cited: Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 Denis Cassegrain & Ors v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd & Ors [2012] NSWSC 403 and [2012] NSWSC 834 Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Cassegrain [2013] Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) NSWLR 319 Severstal Export GmbH v Bhushan Steel Ltd [2013] NSWCA 102. Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Denis Cassegrain (1st Plaintiff/Applicant) Catherine Dunn (2nd Plaintiff/Applicant) Patrick Cassegrain (3rd Plaintiff/Applicant) John Cassegrain (4th Plaintiff/Applicant) Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) (1st Defendant/Applicant) Felicity Cassegrain (3rd Defendant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Ashhurst SC/G Colyer (Plaintiffs and 1st Defendant/Applicants) JJ Garnsey QC/RE Raffell (3rd Defendant/Respondent) Solicitors: File Number(s): 2008/281625 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate