NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barry v Coshott (No 2) [2014] NSWDC 57 Hearing dates: 1 April 2014 Decision date: 02 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiffs against the second defendant in the sum of $37,528.84; and (2) The second defendant pay 90 per cent of the plaintiffs' costs of the notice of motion. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - interest - costs certificate provided for interest - certificate filed - no interest recorded on court computer record Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 14, s 100, s 101 Interpretation Act 1987, s 76 Legal Profession Act 1987, s 190, s 208E, s 208J Legal Profession Regulation 2002, reg 45 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 6.12, r 42.35 Cases Cited: Barry v Coshott [2014] NSWDC 51 CSR Timber Products Pty Ltd v Weathertex Pty Ltd (2013) 83 NSWLR 433 Kuligowski v Metrobus (2004) 220 CLR 363 Oliveri v P M Sulcs and Associates Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1198 Oliveri v P M Sulcs and Associates Pty Ltd (in liq) [2013] NSWCA 84 Papua New Guinea, Administration of the Territory of v Daera Guba (1973) 130 CLR 353 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure New South Wales Category: Costs Parties: Stephen Michael Barry (first plaintiff) Martin Pearce Board (second plaintiff) Ljiljana Coshott (defendant) Representation: Mr K G Oliver (plaintiffs) Mr O R Jones (defendant) CKB Partners (plaintiffs) Martin Place Lawyers (defendant) File Number(s): 2008/320070 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate