NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tan v R [2014] NSWCCA 96 Hearing dates: 9 May 2014 Decision date: 27 May 2014 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: Extension of time in which to apply for leave to appeal against sentence refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for extension of time to appeal against sentence - Muldrock error conceded - no error in finding that offence was in mid-range of objective seriousness - relevance of aggravating factors of organised criminal activity and harm to the community - no justifiable sense of grievance in sentence disparity - no lesser sentence warranted - extension of time to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 Mansour v R [2011] NSWCCA 28 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chin Lai Tan (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr H White (Applicant) Ms V Lydiard (Crown) Solicitors: Dignan & Hanrahan Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2009/152107 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-06-11 00:00:00 Before: Bennett SC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/152107
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate