NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Trackcorp Adrenalin Pty Ltd v Bathurst Regional Council (No.3) [2014] NSWSC 690 Hearing dates: 18-22, 28, 29 November 2013, 26 February 2014 Decision date: 30 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Darke J Decision: Further Amended Statement of Claim is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT - breach - contract permitting plaintiff to hold motor sport event - exclusivity provision - whether defendant breached provision by allowing other promoters to conduct events substantially similar to plaintiff's event - no breach established
EQUITY - remedies - rectification - alleged common intention not established
NEGLIGENCE - existence of duty of care - whether duty owed by one contracting party to another to ensure no breach of exclusivity provision - duty not found to exist
TRADE AND COMMMERCE - representations made in contractual negotiations - whether misleading or deceptive - no misleading or deceptive conduct found - Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) s 42
CONTRACT - breach - obligation to hold good faith negotiations - content of obligation - no failure to honestly and genuinely participate in negotiations - no breach established
REMEDIES - restitution - mistake - fees paid in belief that local council was duly authorised to charge the fees - whether council duly authorised to charge the fees - council had authority to charge the fees - mistake not established
LOCAL GOVERNMENT - power of Council to charge fees to hire motor racing circuit - whether only power is given by Part 10 of Chapter 15 of Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) - whether Council had power to charge fees under Chapter 6 of Local Government Act or general power to contract Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 50(1)(e) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) s 42 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) Part 10 of Chapter 15 Mount Panorama Motor Racing Act 1989 (NSW) s 5 Cases Cited: Bush v National Australia Bank Ltd (1992) 35 NSWLR 390 Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd v Stavar (2009) 75 NSWLR 649; [2009] NSWCA 258 Coal Cliff Collieries Pty Ltd v Sijehama Pty Ltd (1991) 24 NSWLR 1 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Carlenka Pty Ltd (1995) 41 NSWLR 329 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW [1982] HCA 24; (1982) 149 CLR 337 Dowling v Dalgety Australia Ltd (1992) 34 FCR 109 McCrohon v Harith [2010] NSWCA 67 McGrath v Australian Naturalcare Products Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 2; (2008) 165 FCR 230 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL [1994] HCA 4; (1994) 179 CLR 332 United Group Rail Services Limited v Rail Corporation New South Wales (2009) 74 NSWLR 618; [2009] NSWCA 177 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Trackcorp Adrenalin Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Bathurst Regional Council (defendant) Representation: Counsel: G A Sirtes SC, S A Lawrance (plaintiff) B W Rayment QC, J E Thomson (defendant) Solicitors: Whittens & McKeough (plaintiff) McIntosh McPhillamy & Co (defendant) File Number(s): 2010/76709 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate