NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Simon Monteiro pursuant to s. 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 710 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 03 June 2014 Before: Bellew J Decision: (i) The application is granted. (ii) The matter is referred to the Court of Criminal Appeal to be dealt with as an appeal under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application under s. 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - whether doubt or question as to a mitigating circumstance - whether evidence of Muldrock error - error established - application granted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Butler v R [2012] NSWCCA 23 Monteiro v R; R v Monteiro [2011] NSWCCA 113 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 The Application of Joy Lorraine Knight pursuant to s. 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act [2014] NSWSC 285 The Application of Victor Makarov pursuant to s. 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 NSW [2013] NSWSC 1468 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Sinkovich v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Monteiro - Applicant Attorney-General for NSW - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Solicitors: Legal Aid New South Wales - Applicant Crown Solicitors for New South Wales - Respondent File Number(s): 2013/215601 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate