NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BHM v BHN & Ors [2014] NSWCATAP 26 Hearing dates: 16 May 2014 Decision date: 10 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: N Hennessy LCM, Deputy President M Schyvens, Deputy President J Newman, General Member Decision: 1. The Appellant's application for leave to appeal against a decision of the Guardianship Division made on 6 May 2014 to refuse an application for an adjournment is refused. 2. The Appellant's application for leave to appeal against a decision of the Guardianship Division made on 6 May 2014 to refuse leave for him to represent the Second Respondent is refused. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) - appeal - interlocutory decisions - leave required - principles applicable to leave to appeal Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Jaycar Pty Ltd v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Goddard Elliott (a firm) v Fritsch [2012] VSC 87 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BHM (Appellant) BHN (First respondent) BHO (Second respondent) The Public Guardian (Third respondent) Representation: Appellant (publication restricted) First Respondent (self-represented) Second Respondent (self-represented) File Number(s): AP 14/0092 Publication restriction: Under s 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the names of the parties and anyone appearing before the Tribunal in these proceedings is prohibited. Decision under appeal Citation: 2014/3872 Date of Decision: 2014-05-06 00:00:00 Before: R Gurr File Number(s): C/45685
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate